The Tolkienian War on Science by Dr. Joan Bushwell

Posted on 26 April 2007; updated on 25 February 2021

| | |

This article was previously published in SEED Magazine's Science Blogs in March 2007.


The Tolkienian War on Science

When I was a little kid, I frequently snuck into my older brother's room and read his collection of science fiction books and pulp magazines (see previous post on SF&F books). My mother, who was (and is) a big fan of The Princess and the Goblin by George MacDonald (a lovely book and recommended) thought I might benefit from reading some fantasy so she bought The Hobbit for me when I was 12 (6th grade; 1966, yes, I am that old) which I happily read. My brother, who was a college student at the time, then brought home The Lord of the Rings in 1968, and I devoured it. I re-read The Hobbit and the trilogy throughout high school, and when The Silmarillion and Unfinished Tales were published, these were added to my Tolkien collection which, in addition to many other fantasy and sci-fi books, I read throughout grad school and into my post-doctoral years as wonderful escapism from the realities of thesis research and fellowship proposals.

A funny thing happened. Real Life, that is, children and a career intervened, and although I remained an avid reader, I rarely read science fiction and fantasy, and JRRT's works were among those that went by the wayside. I did, however, turn my kids on to Tolkien, and my son, in particular, became a fan.

My family and I dutifully went to the Harvard Square theater for three successive Decembers to see Peter Jackson's interpretation of Tolkien, and I have to say he did a decent job. But I still didn't pick up the books to re-read at the time, mostly because I knew this would be too much of a juxtaposition with the movies, and I didn't want to get all weird over orthodoxy. However, it turned out that it was easy for me to enjoy the Jackson-Walsh-Boyens "non-canon" vision.

After a hiatus of a number of years, I re-read The Silmarillion this past winter. What a difference life experience makes. When I first read the book, I was fresh out of undergrad and not really too aware of a lot of the politics surrounding science and technology. I just liked science and was eager to know more, so off I went to grad school and a post-doc. During that pleasantly naive time, I re-read The Silmarillion but not quite the way I did recently. So what has happened between then and and now? Well, I read it through the prism of my experience and the current climate surrounding science in our culture.

My screed won't make much sense to anyone who is not nerdsome enough to have read The Silmarillion and an even more extensive encyclopedic collection, The History of Middle-earth, but those of you who have "Kick Me" signs taped to your backs should be able to follow along.

By way of background, the meddlesome Valar, Tolkien's angelic beings/pagan god-critters, have dragged a number of Elves to their paradise in the West, Aman. This was in the Elves' "best interest" since Middle-earth was filled with badness and darkness, and just generally icky marred stuff, thanks to the bad Vala, Morgoth. Hence, the well-meaning Valar wanted to protect them. Of course, they left behind the Dark Elves, who were unwilling to leave Middle Earth, to deal with Morgoth's crap as best they could. There were three groups of Elves living in Aman in the West: the Vanyar, the pious faithful who were sycophants of the Valar, the Teleri who were the surfer-dudes who dug tunes, built ships and lived by the sea, and finally, the Noldor.

This time I recognized the Noldor. Tolkien called then "craftsmen and smiths." Read that in 21st century-speak and you know that these people are our people: scientists and engineers. Now science and engineering are amoral in and of themselves, but those who practice such crafts are only human, so are equally subject to good and bad influences, but Tolkien really, really did not like modernism and science/technology. Thus, there were plenty of morality lessons to be had among the crafty Elves. In his milieu, the most talented of sci-tech types among the Noldor were prideful and possessive, easily corrupted and therefore worthy of punishment.

Fëanor, the master smith/scientist/engineer created three high tech artifacts, the Silmarils. Morgoth coveted the Silmarils. In his efforts to gain the jewels, Morgoth worked to create divisions among the Noldor and subsequently tainted their work, not unlike the US administration's pressure on those scientists who studied global warming to withhold data or those in the FDA who stopped Plan B.

Morgoth turned out to be a nefarious intellectual property thief when he made off with Fëanor's Silmarils. Fëanor was justifiably pissed off, and pursued him. The Valar were not much better than Morgoth in that they subtly coveted the three jewels, and chastised Fëanor for being so angry that his IP rights had been violated. Plus they just wrung their divine hands and generally were whiny and ineffectual.

OK, so maybe Fëanor's hijacking the ships in Alqualondë and killing their Telerin owners were extreme reactions in his drive to recover the Silmarils, but figuratively speaking, the same thing happens in the contemporary, er, real world of science and technology if someone gets in the way. Companies have been broken because of patent infringement, and in academia, major shittola hits the fan if there is a hint of unethical scooping between competing labs. Kinslaying abounds.

Fëanor didn't think too highly of the Valar, and as a skeptical and fiercely independent scientist/technologist, he was an outright agnostic when it came to worshipping them in contrast to the Vanyar, the blond Elves who surely would have been comfortable at Liberty College. The Vanyar genuflected and sung hymns to these allegedly angelic beings, who interfered just as much with the Elves as the obnoxious Greek pantheon did with the residents of Troy and Athens, or the Christian Right does with, well, a lot of people. So Fëanor's decidedly jaundiced view of the divine was yet another thing I recognized and with which I identified.

This time around, I could see where Fëanor was coming from. The Valar and Morgoth roundly screwed him on all sides. Even though I realized it before, and just didn't want to face it years ago, it was obvious that JRRT really did not think well of scientists and technologists. If we get too big for our britches, we should be punished. This sentiment rings out loud and clear in his books. I mean, the rebellious Noldor went through a lot of misery for millennia. Tolkien punished them all relentlessly.

Less sympathetic, but still recognizable as a sci-tech type, is the lesser of two Evils with a capital "E", i.e., Sauron. He's not quite as horrible as his big boss, Dick Cheney, er, I mean, Morgoth, although still pretty bad. Sort of like a CEO who loves to micromanage. In his original uncorrupted state, he did his grad work and post-doc with Aulë, the Vala who was the patron of smiths and craftsmen, again, read, the scientists and engineers. Sauron seemed like a fairly creative sort, and Tolkien even states that he loved order. That's familiar: the desire to understand the order of the world. However, Sauron also wanted to force order on the world, sort of a control freak, really, but I know a few of those in the scientific arena. Don't we all? There are certain features of Sauron, well, maybe not so much the werewolf thing, which are apparent in scientists and engineers, and he has some features in common with Fëanor from the science and technology angle.

As an esoteric aside, Tolkien also wrote a little piece on Elvish anthropology in Morgoth's Ring (History of Middle-earth, vol. 10) in which he briefly describes Elvish gender roles in "Laws and Customs of the Eldar." Given when it was written, it was relatively progressive, but still, the women avoid hard science. Oh, but the men cook, you say, Professor? Does that mitigate the fact that the women are relegated to embroidery, healing and the softer arts? Well, Manwë in Varda, I don't think so!

Yeah, I know, Tolkien's attitude should not come as a surprise to me, and really, it doesn't. I can still read all the books and enjoy them, even if they are drenched, quenched and incensed in Tolkien's Catholicism and his longing for a noble, pastoral world. After all, a number of the virtues that JRRT extols can be found aplenty in atheists and agonistics. But the punishment of scientists and technologists? Well, that is a little tough to stomach. My advice to Fëanor: next time, get yourself a phalanx of good patent attorneys. Morgoth will wither in fear at the prospect of litigation.

 


 

My apologies to Chris Mooney, (The Republican War on Science), but I couldn't resist.

See also We Hobbits are a Merry Folk: An Incautious and Heretical Reappraisal of J.R.R. Tolkien by David Brin. This was called to my attention by a commenter in the original article.


About pandemonium_213

Doc Bushwell is a biochemist and a minion of the dark lords of pharma. She is a longtime Tolkien fan, having first read JRRT’s works in the Years of the Lamps. Her public blathering on things scientific may be found on Dr. Joan Bushwell’s Chimpanzee Refuge where she occasionally gets a word in edgewise amongst the raucous hoots of the boisterous young male bonobos. She discreetly indulges in her newly acquired vice of Tolkienism and offers mostly non-scientific yammering at The Bad Clam Incident as “pandemonium_213.”


Oh so true! And despite this antipathy for anything more technical than a wheelbarrow, several apparently magical or prodigious objects are given to the heroes of the Fellowship, in order to help them overcome the "scientific", machinery-driven evil promoted by Saruman and Sauron: the light of Earendil given to Frodo, super-nutritious lembas, swords that turn blue when Orcs approach, Elvish rope, the miraculous plantfood given to Sam, etc.  

As one who loves Physics and Maths, I wholeheartedly agree with your views and proudly consider myself a nerd and a heretic.

But I still love to read Tolkien's Middle-earth, though I rant at him when he gets into his pastoral mood! 

Great article, pandemonium, thank you! 

 

Thanks so much, Russandol, for reading this screed, which is essentially the manifesto of the Pandë!verse. :^D  Strictly speaking, Tolkien had nothing against science per se and in fact was keenly interested in it.  He used his interest and layman's knowledge of astronomy, botany and even paleontology to great effect in creating his secondary world, thereby enriching it.  So I think here as you aptly note...

the light of Earendil given to Frodo, super-nutritious lembas, swords that turn blue when Orcs approach, Elvish rope, the miraculous plantfood given to Sam, etc. 

...these are all "good" aspects of science and technology.  But as you and I know, it is extremely difficult to separate the good from the "bad" in science and technology.   

Tolkien wrote an interesting discourse on "good" vs. "bad" magic in Letter 155 to Naomi Mitchison (the writer who aptly called The Lord of the Rings "super science fiction"):

I am afraid I have been far too casual about 'magic' and especially the use of the word; though Galadriel and others show by the criticism of the 'mortal' use of the word, that the thought about it is not altogether casual. But it is a v. large question, and difficult; and a story which, as you so rightly say, is largely about motives (choice, temptations etc.) and the intentions for using whatever is found in the world, could hardly be burdened with a pseudo-philosophic disquisition! I do not intend to involve myself in any debate whether 'magic' in any sense is real or really possible in the world. But I suppose that, for the purposes of the tale, some would say that there is a latent distinction such as once was called the distinction between magia and goeteia.1 Galadriel speaks of the 'deceits of the Enemy'. Well enough, but magia could be, was, held good (per se), and goeteia bad. Neither is, in this tale, good or bad (per se), but only by motive or purpose or use. Both sides use both, but with different motives. The supremely bad motive is (for this tale, since it is specially about it) domination of other 'free' wills. The Enemy's operations are by no means all goetic deceits, but 'magic' that produces real effects in the physical world. But his magia he uses to bulldoze both people and things, and his goeteia to terrify and subjugate. Their magia the Elves and Gandalf use (sparingly): a magia, producing real results (like fire in a wet faggot) for specific beneficent purposes. Their goetic effects are entirely artistic and not intended to deceive: they never deceive Elves (but may deceive or bewilder unaware Men) since the difference is to them as clear as the difference to us between fiction, painting, and sculpture, and 'life'.

Both sides live mainly by 'ordinary' means. The Enemy, or those who have become like him, go in for 'machinery' – with destructive and evil effects — because 'magicians', who have become chiefly concerned to use magia for their own power, would do so (do do so). The basic motive for magia – quite apart from any philosophic consideration of how it would work – is immediacy: speed, reduction of labour, and reduction also to a minimum (or vanishing point) of the gap between the idea or desire and the result or effect. But the magia may not be easy to come by, and at any rate if you have command of abundant slave-labour or machinery (often only the same thing concealed), it may be as quick or quick enough to push mountains over, wreck forests, or build pyramids by such means. Of course another factor then comes in, a moral or pathological one: the tyrants lose sight of objects, become cruel, and like smashing, hurting, and defiling as such. It would no doubt be possible to defend poor Lotho's introduction of more efficient mills; but not of Sharkey and Sandyman's use of them.

I read -- with a nod to Arthur C. Clarke's Third Law, i.e. "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" -- "magia" and "goetia" as something like science and technology.  Tolkien wrote that these could be applied for good or bad purposes, and I certainly agree with that. However, even those efficient mills used in the absence of Sharkey and crew still have a price.

So the title of my screed is kind of a misnomer, but "The Tolkienian War on Scientists"  just didn't have the same ring as what I used, conceived not long after (then) fellow Science Blogger Chris Mooney wrote The Republican War on Science.  Most of the famous (and infamous) of the "fallen" beings of his mythopoiea were "smiths" and "craftsmen."   That certainly slapped me in the face when I re-read The Silmarillion after a 20 year hiatus...and spawned the Pandë!verse! :^D

Thanks again!

 

Tolkien definitely had conflicted views!  It really was eye-opening to have such a long hiatus between reading The Silmarillion during grad school, and then waiting 20 years before reading it again.  And I still get riled up. :^D

We ended up closing our Science Blogs account for a number of reasons but the essay is on the Chimp Refuge v.3 (http:chimprefuge.com) which I have shamefully neglected. 

Thanks a million for having a read, Ithilwen, and for the kind words.

I find myself feeling as if you expressed my feelings on this subject, but I enjoyed your sarcastic humor in this essay more then anything. "Plus they just wrung their divine hands and generally were whiny and ineffectual." :-)

I am no scientist, nor am I interested in science topics, but the wrongs caused to the Noldor simply for seeking knowledge, and finding it (Feanor), are a bit too much, even if I, like everyone else on this site, still love and enjoy reading Tolkien's creation. 

"I enjoyed your sarcastic humor in this essay more then anything."

Heh.  Thanks muchly, Scarlet!  Once I cease being sarcastic and/or sardonic, I will cease breathing.  

Yes, the perpetual notion that seeking deep knowledge is perilous carries through in Tolkien's writings.  I can't disagree that it has its moral quandries, but not to seek it is perilous, too. 

Yep, I may disagree strongly with some of JRRT's opinions, but I do love his mythology!  

Thanks again!

Hiya pandemonium!  Love your fiction, and this as well.  

Tolkien did, after all, have an excuse, having experienced firsthand the horrific damage done by modern weapons in WWI.  I try to keep that in mind whenever I read the Silm, HOME, and other works.  He was a very unusual person; I can't think of any others who so obviously would have been most comfortable living in pre-Renaissance Europe.  So basically I'm not bothered by his attitudes, and try to just sit back and enjoy the ride.

I'm a physicist btw.  I once read Tolkien's attempt at explaining why some types of knowledge were good and others bad.  Unfortunately can't remember the reference, but basically he tried to distinguish between theoretical and practical knowledge.  It was nonsensicaL and reflected his own ignorance more than anything else.  Anyway, finding out that he basically had no idea what he was talking about made his attitudes much easier to stomach :)

Hey, thanks muchly for reading this old screed, maeglin, and for the compliments overall.   Yes, he did have an excuse, but there were also those who fought in WWI, saw the same destruction inflicted by modern weapons, but did not eschew technology and progress quite so vocally.   Heh.  Yep, I imagine he might enjoy living in pre-Renaissance Europe.  My grandfathers (both a good decade older than JRRT), however, very much embraced the benefits of modern medicine (antibiotics) and "infernal combustion engines."    My paternal grandfather was the proud owner of the first steam engine-driven tractor in his rural county.  He was a regular Sandyman, a farmer with a mind of metal and wheels, if you will.  :^)

Like you, I definitely enjoy the ride, and JRRT's attitudes toward progress certainly don't keep me from immersing myself in his work.  There's a lot to love about it.  But it's not beyond a critical look, whether by a blog screed or ficcish hackery.

"I once read Tolkien's attempt at explaining why some types of knowledge were good and others bad."

Maybe from Letter 155 (to Naomi Mitchison) in which JRRT expounds on magia vs. goetia?

I expect both of us have encountered those who hold theoretical knowledge (or "pure" science) on a pedestal while blasting more applied aspects (as someone who sold her soul to one of the world's most reviled industries, I should know of such blasting), pouring out their criticism of technology and the evils of progress...while typing away on a computer. :^D

Thanks again for having a read and the comments!

Oh my goodness, this essay is wonderful, and fully expresses what until now were only half-formed thoughts in my mind.

I love your description of Morgoth as a 'nefarious intellectual property thief'!

I, too, never really understood or empathised with Tolkien's views on science and technology. There's this whole idea that we/Elves shouldn't get too proud of the works of our own hands, that humility is ultimately more important than innovation. I think that's very difficult for modern sensibilities, and was in fact probably anachronistic even at the time Tolkien was writing.

Still, I like that you are able to introduce a more positive view of science into your fanfiction; it's something of balm to readers who don't agree with Tolkien's religious-pastoral worldview.

 

I did expect a scientific and academical kind of writing, but I found myself chuckling at the numerous comments of yours. Either way, I don't mind the level of speech used, as long as I can understand (I wouldn't even understand specific terminology in my native language anyways).

"when I was 12 (6th grade; 1966, yes, I am that old)"

Wow, beating my papa who read The Hobbit in the 70s and he wasn't even in 6th grade! (I think he was by the end of the 70s). If it can reassure you, you're still young. For instance, my great-granny was among us until last year and she was 104-105 yo (her mum died at 101). And the sun is a tad older as well. It's all a matter of perspective *taps forehead* 

 

"Thus, there were plenty of morality lessons to be had among the crafty Elves. In his milieu, the most talented of sci-tech types among the Noldor were prideful and possessive, easily corrupted and therefore worthy of punishment."

I took it as the danger of creativity and breaking the greater harmony of space and time (i.e Melkor). I did find it odd that all the villains were smiths, and jumped to the conclusion there was an archetype (with a redemption arc—Aulë, the Dwarves in The Hobbit, Gimli). But it's true he was an environmentalist who detested industrialisation (Saruman of MaNy CoLaHz made it plain clear in LotR).

 

"The Vanyar genuflected and sung hymns to these allegedly angelic beings, who interfered just as much with the Elves as the obnoxious Greek pantheon did with the residents of Troy and Athens (...)"

I don't know the Greeks, the first thing that came to my mind was that Indra from puranic literature would love Vanyar to sign hymns and make a vedic revival of his past-vedic glory. Or Seth after being demonised by the Greeks (or maybe it was the Persians? My Egyptian history is rusty). Either way, deities like to interfere, not necessarily when best and most appropriate. That's what makes Valar entertaining. They'd be interesting as abstract concepts only, but them as flawed, sentient beings, adds a touch (but Maiar stonks though, Gandulf ftw, what a salty one).

 

"Sort of like a CEO who loves to micromanage."

Sauron is just like MCU!Loki: he dies, but then, he re-appears. I like that guy.

 

"However, Sauron also wanted to force order on the world, sort of a control freak, really, but I know a few of those in the scientific arena."

Yep. The opposition to the leap of faith, and harmony (the harmony commonly understood as being the one that works (Eru's)—Sauron's idea of harmony is doomed to failure).

 

"I can still read all the books and enjoy them, even if they are drenched, quenched and incensed in Tolkien's Catholicism and his longing for a noble, pastoral world."

Do you think Tolkien and Dostoevsky would get along? Perhaps Tolstoy? :D

Either way, there's a contrast between the Tolkien who wrote Lost Tales and The Story of Kullervo, where ancient polytheistic myths and traditions bear a greater influence, to a later Tolkien who was drawn to his ideal.